Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Clin Med ; 11(19)2022 Sep 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2066183

ABSTRACT

Pregnant women were excluded from vaccination against Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) until September 2021 in South Korea. Although vaccination for pregnant women started in October 2021, vaccine acceptance in pregnant women is yet unknown. This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate COVID-19 vaccine acceptance during pregnancy and influencing factors. An anonymous survey was distributed in obstetrics departments to all pregnant or postpartum women, during the prenatal or postpartum visit. The proportion of self-reported COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy among 436 women was 26.6%. Pregnancy-related independent factors influencing maternal COVID-19 vaccination were "received vaccine information about from obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) doctors" (OR 3.41, 95% CI 2.05-5.65), "cohabitant COVID-19 vaccination" (OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.06-5.59), and "second trimester" (OR 7.35, 95% CI 1.54-35.15). In women who did not want to get vaccinated, the most common reason for COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy was concern that COVID-19 vaccine might affect the fetus (91.7%, 243/266), followed by distrust in COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (42.6%, 113/266). This study showed that providing information about maternal COVID-19 vaccination, especially by OBGYN doctors, is crucial for increasing vaccination coverage in pregnant women. Providing updated evidence of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and safety in pregnant women may be also helpful for increasing vaccine acceptance.

2.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 16288, 2022 09 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2050523

ABSTRACT

Birthweight is a strong determinant of a neonate's health. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic's impact on birthweight has not been investigated in-depth, with inconsistent conclusions from initial studies. To assess changes in preterm birth and inappropriate birthweight between the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and pre-pandemic periods. A nationwide birth micro-data consisted with exhaustive census of all births in 2011-2020 in South Korea was accessed to examine whether the mean birthweight and rates of under/overweight births changed significantly during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic year (2020) compared to those of the pre-pandemic period (2011-2019). A total of 3,736,447 singleton births were analyzed. Preterm birth was defined as < 37 weeks of gestation. Low birthweight (LBW) and macrosomia were defined as birthweights < 2.5 kg and ≥ 4.0 kg, respectively. Small for gestational age (SGA) and large for gestational age (LGA) were defined as birthweights below the 10th and above 90th percentiles for sex and gestational age, respectively. Inappropriate birthweight was defined as one or more LBW, macrosomia, SGA, or LGA. Generalized linear models predicted birth outcomes and were adjusted for parental age and education level, marital status, parity, gestational age, and months from January 2011. There were 3,481,423 and 255,024 singleton births during the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods, respectively. Multivariable generalized linear models estimated negative associations between the pandemic and preterm birth (odds ratio [OR], 0.968; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.958-0.978), LBW (OR: 0.967, 95% CI 0.956-0.979), macrosomia (OR: 0.899, 95% CI 0.886-0.912), SGA (OR: 0.974, 95% CI 0.964-0.983), LGA (OR: 0.952, 95% CI 0.945-0.959), and inappropriate birthweight (OR: 0.958, 95% CI 0.952-0.963), indicating a decline during the pandemic compared to pre-pandemic period. An 8.98 g decrease in birthweight (95% CI 7.98-9.99) was estimated during the pandemic. This is the largest and comprehensive nationwide study to date on the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on preterm birth and inappropriate birthweight. Birth during the pandemic was associated with lower odds of being preterm, underweight, and overweight. Further studies are required to understand the dynamics underlying this phenomenon.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Premature Birth , Birth Weight , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Fetal Macrosomia/epidemiology , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Overweight , Pandemics , Pregnancy , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Weight Gain
3.
Obstet Gynecol Sci ; 65(6): 487-501, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1975242

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study systematically analyzed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and vaccination details during pregnancy by using the national health insurance claims data. METHODS: Population-based retrospective cohort data of 12,399,065 women aged 15-49 years were obtained from the Korea National Health Insurance Service claims database between 2019 and 2021. Univariate analysis was performed to compare the obstetric outcomes of pregnant women (ICD-10 O00-O94) and their newborns (ICD-10 P00-P96) with and without COVID-19. Univariate analysis was also performed to compare the age and obstetric outcomes of pregnant women receiving different types of vaccines. RESULTS: The percentage of pregnant women with COVID-19 during pregnancy was 0.11%. Some obstetric outcomes of pregnant women with COVID-19, including the rates of preterm birth or cesarean delivery, were significantly better than those of pregnant women without COVID-19. The rate of miscarriage was higher in pregnant women with COVID-19 than without COVID-19. However, the outcomes of newborns of women with and without COVID-19 were not significantly different. Regarding vaccination type, obstetric outcomes of pregnant women appeared to be worse with the viral vector vaccine than with the mRNA vaccine. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to systematically analyze COVID-19 and vaccination details during pregnancy using the national health insurance claims data in Korea. The obstetric outcomes in pregnant women with and without COVID-19 and their newborns were similar.

4.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol ; 12: 850744, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1952256

ABSTRACT

The endemic and pandemic caused by respiratory virus infection are a major cause of mortality and morbidity globally. Thus, broadly effective antiviral drugs are needed to treat respiratory viral diseases. Small extracellular vesicles derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (U-exo) have recently gained attention as a cell-free therapeutic strategy due to their potential for safety and efficacy. Anti-viral activities of U-exo to countermeasure respiratory virus-associated diseases are currently unknown. Here, we tested the antiviral activities of U-exo following influenza A/B virus (IFV) and human seasonal coronavirus (HCoV) infections in vitro. Cells were subject to IFV or HCoV infection followed by U-exo treatment. U-exo treatment significantly reduced IFV or HCoV replication and combined treatment with recombinant human interferon-alpha protein (IFN-α) exerted synergistically enhanced antiviral effects against IFV or HCoV. Interestingly, microRNA (miR)-125b, which is one of the most abundantly expressed small RNAs in U-exo, was found to suppress IFV replication possibly via the induction of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs). Furthermore, U-exo markedly enhanced RNA virus-triggered IFN signaling and ISGs production. Similarly, human nasal epithelial cells cultured at the air-liquid interface (ALI) studies broadly effective anti-viral and anti-inflammatory activities of U-exo against IFV and HCoV, suggesting the potential role of U-exo as a promising intervention for respiratory virus-associated diseases.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus , Exosomes , Extracellular Vesicles , Mesenchymal Stem Cells , Antiviral Agents/metabolism , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Humans , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/metabolism , Umbilical Cord
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL